Epping Forest Guardian
Thursday, 19th June 2008
Reported by Emily Roberts
OBJECTORS turned out in force as councillors threw out plans for a 351-home development.
But the land at the St Margaret's Hospital site, at The Plain, in Epping, could still be developed if developer Bellway Homes challenges the decision, and wins an appeal.
It is not yet known whether it will fight on, but the land already has outline planning approval.
Members of the Plainly Say No group and local residents were delighted with the decision taken by the area planning sub-committee last night (Wednesday) when councillors unanimously opposed the controversial proposals.
Bellway Homes had submitted plans to build a range of flats and houses with one to four bedrooms.
But councillors rejected the application saying the development did not fit in with the character of Epping.
Councillor Chris Whitbread said: "It's completely out of keeping with the town that I've grown up in and loved. It deserves to be confined to the rubbish bin of design."
Plainly Say No group leader David Windrow told the meeting: "Residents will not be able to walk to the station, and High Street parking is already a problem. It will increase the population of Epping. We totally object to this development."
The site is formed from land formerly occupied by hospital wards, and outline planning permission was granted in 2000 for redevelopment to provide hospital accommodation and housing.
But the plans were criticised and opposed by Epping Town Council, the City of London, Natural England and local residents, with 87 objections sent to the district council.
Council leader Di Collins said: "It's obviously not the sort of design we're looking for in Epping."
While councillor Matthew Colling said: "I think it's a very poor design and inappropriate for Epping. It's too far away from the station and it would lead to a massive overflow to the station which is already fit to burst."
Speaking after the decision, campaign group member Jeanette Goatcher, of The Plain, told the Guardian: "We're delighted. It was a unanimous refusal by the committee members. I can't see how they could win an appeal after a refusal like that. Everyone is against it."
John Barber, of Forest Lodge, added: "I think it was a sensible decision from the council. If they decide to appeal we will fight it accordingly."